Details and Past Winners

2018-2019
2017-2018
2016-2017
2015-2016
2014-2015
2013-2014
2012-2013

2013- 2014

Poster
Submission Criteria and Form

Finalists

Project Title

Student(s)

University

Faculty Sponsor(s)

Award

Suspended in the TreesAngela NgRyerson UniversityMark CichyAward of Excellence
Cirrus WangMark WeiyiUniversity of WaterlooTerri Meyer BoakeAward of Merit
Longbow CrossingThomas Noussis & Marshall MykietyshynUniversity of WaterlooTerri Meyer Boake & Matthew SpremulliAward of Merit
SHIFT: Pavilion I BridgeMin Joon (Jeff) Jang & Roger XuRyerson UniversityVincent HuiTop 10
The Esoteric HarpKaram Hunjan & Ethan SchwartzUniversity of WaterlooTerri Meyer Boake &
Matthew Spremulli
Top 10
“Span”Di Wang & Alexandru Vilcu & Richard MuiUniversity of WaterlooTerri Meyer BoakeTop 10
Elevated FieldElaina Poleto & Keegan Steeper & Thomas YuanUniversity of WaterlooTerri Meyer BoakeTop 10
Concentric BridgeTimothy MelnichukRyerson UniversityMark CichyTop 10
Rouge River Pedestrian BridgeRon Noble Ryerson UniversityMark CichyTop 10
VIEW POINTAnusha RameshRyerson UniversityMark CichyTop 10

Judging Panel

Holly Jordan – B+H Architects
Gerry Lang – architectsAlliance
Neb Erakovic – CH2M Hill Canada Limited
Tim Verhey – Walters Inc.

The Challenge

Historically, the ability of materials to span has challenged architectural design. Stone, wood, concrete and metals were limited by their own self-weight, as well as their capacity to resist bending stresses. As more advanced designs such as arches, domes and trusses were developed, greater spans were achieved, but self-weight and structural depth continued pose challenges. As engineering and design advanced, the complexities of spanning were brought into harmony through the development of new forms and material. For example, metallurgical advancements in structural steel enabled spans that were unthinkable a century ago.

While engineering has led to the conquering of ever-increasing spans, the real benefit of advanced engineering principles and material science is reflected not so much in greater distances as the unleashing of architectural imagination. Brute muscle has been replaced by finely tuned compositions that intertwine tension and compression in highly refined forms. Strategies such as stressed skins, honeycombed cells and diagrids have led designers to the precipice not only of mimicking the engineering marvels that took nature untold millennia to achieve, but to the point where we dare dream of outperforming even her. Yet despite the wonders of computer-driven engineering solutions to achieve the resolution of spans in ways we never dreamed possible, can’t the simplistic beauty of an elegant solution ever truly be overlooked?

The challenge offered by this year’s competition is to explore span – not only by pushing the limits of imagination, but also by re-examining the purity and simplicity that architecture has engaged since time immemorial.

Competition Statement

The intention of this design competition is primarily to provide students of architecture in Canada with a unique opportunity: to enter into a design process that brings together, of necessity, concept and reality. It is important for students of architecture to grasp the fact that structural design lies not just in the realm of the engineer, but can be a means for architects of arriving at a meaningful realization of architectural ideas. It is when theory meets physical necessity that architecture can become really interesting.

To that end, this competition calls upon students to conceptualize, and realize in detail, a structure of simple program that explores span. The exploration will, of course, include issues related to program and site, but the emphasis in this competition is upon the architectural exploration through form and material, on the essential relationship between architecture and structure.

The reality of this competition comes in two forms: through the requirement for buildable details, primarily utilizing structural steel; and through the collaboration with the steel fabrication industry on those details. This collaboration is an important component of this competition, as a secondary objective is to expose students to both the opportunities and restraints inherent in realizing conceptual design.

The conceptual component of this competition will come through the recommendation that this competition be run through either a studio, or a lecture based course, most probably within a structures course. Under the guidance of faculty sponsors, students will conduct the design process as an academic exercise, within the guidelines set out in this brief. As an academic project, the design process will adhere to the standards set forth by the students’ school of architecture.